thehomeland.org - main menu

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
weekcountingproblem [2026/02/13 02:14] – thehomelandweekcountingproblem [2026/02/13 02:42] (current) – [Possible Solutions] thehomeland
Line 23: Line 23:
 | 9m | 10m | 11m | 12m | 12m1w | | 9m | 10m | 11m | 12m | 12m1w |
  
-The question remains: Need we bother with ensuring each year comes up to 52 counts (since counts are not tallied in the actual process), and just leave it at the incompleteness of 52? If we do need bother, what solution should we apply, to ensure each of the 52 weeks is accounted for, but without interrupting the normal flow of the process? +==== The question remains: ==== 
 +----
  
 +1. Need we bother, with ensuring each year comes up to 52 counts (since counts are not tallied in the actual process), and just leave it at the incompleteness of 52?  The simple answer to that is no, and to just move on.
 +
 +2. If do need bother, what solution should we apply, to ensure each of the 52 weeks is accounted for, but without interrupting the normal flow of the process? 
 +
 +==== Possible Solutions ====
 +----
 +
 +Let's explore adding 1 leap weeks every 6 months: insert a 6m0w leap-week every 6 months, as a separate count from the normal 6m, so that we go 5m2w, 5m3w, 6m, 6m0w, 6m1w, 6m2w. That would show up as: 
 +
 +^ 1 count ^ 5 counts ^ 9 counts ^ 13 counts ^ 17 counts ^ 
 +|   | 1w | 1m1w | 2m1w | 3m1w | 
 +|   | 2w | 1m2w | 2m2w | 3m2w |
 +|   | 3w | 1m3w | 2m3w | 3m3w |
 +|   | 1m | 2m | 3m | 4m |
 +| 0m0w |   |   |   |   |
 +
 +^ 21 counts ^ 26 counts ^ 30 counts ^ 34 counts ^
 +| 4m1w | 5m1w | 6m1w | 7m1w |
 +| 4m2w | 5m2w | 6m2w | 7m2w |
 +| 4m3w | 5m3w | 6m3w | 7m3w |
 +| 5m | 6m | 7m | 8m |
 +|   | 6m0w |   |   | 
 +
 +
 +^ 38 counts ^ 42 counts ^ 46 counts ^ 51 counts ^ 52 counts ^
 +| 8m1w | 9m1w | 10m1w | 11m1w | 1y1w |
 +| 8m2w | 9m2w | 10m2w | 11m2w |  |
 +| 8m3w | 9m3w | 10m3w | 11m3w |  |
 +| 9m | 10m | 11m | 1y |   |
 +|   |    |   | 1y0w |   |
 +
 +This seems like a viable solution, but wouldn't that therefore make the start of the next count of 1y2w be the starting count for the next 52, whereas the start of the first 52 was 0m0w? 

Trace:

Navigation

most updated/flux:

—-

—-

If you're a mobile browser, (a) get thee to a desktop, or (b) click Printable Version below for a less-cramped version.

Print/export
QR Code
QR Code weekcountingproblem (generated for current page)